SETI@home v7 6.98 for ATI OpenCL released.

Message boards : News : SETI@home v7 6.98 for ATI OpenCL released.

1 · 2 · 3 · 4 . . . 7 · Next

Author	Message
Eric J Korpela Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 15 Mar 05 Posts: 953 Credit: 6,137,804 RAC: 8,296	Message 44058 - Posted: 16 Oct 2012, 23:20:50 UTC
	We're just guessing at the requirements for this version, so point me at any hosts that are repeatedly failing with this app version. ____________
	ID: 44058 ·

Raistmer Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 18 Aug 05 Posts: 965 Credit: 5,363,919 RAC: 11,846	Message 44060 - Posted: 16 Oct 2012, 23:23:26 UTC - in response to Message 44058.
	my host already failed. Look for E-mail. it got absolutely wrong binary under plan class ati_opencl_sah.
	ID: 44060 ·

Eric J Korpela Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 15 Mar 05 Posts: 953 Credit: 6,137,804 RAC: 8,296	Message 44063 - Posted: 16 Oct 2012, 23:36:56 UTC - in response to Message 44060.
	I've released 6.99 which should have the correct binary. Sorry about that. ____________
	ID: 44063 ·

Sten-Arne Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 10 Mar 12 Posts: 484 Credit: 2,544,646 RAC: 7,111	Message 44064 - Posted: 16 Oct 2012, 23:47:16 UTC - in response to Message 44063.
	I've released 6.99 which should have the correct binary. Sorry about that. I have one ati_opencl_100 running at the moment, should be done in 30 minutes. I have suspended all other ati_opencl_100, so when that one is finished, my first ati_opencl_sah should start. I received 47 ati_opencl_sah tasks Did I also get the wrong binaries? I got: setiathome_6.98_windows_intelx86__opencl_ati_sah.exe setiathome_6.98_windows_intelx86__opencl_ati_sah.pdb MultiBeam_Kernels_r1643.cl If those are wrong, what should I do with the tasks I have?
	ID: 44064 ·

Raistmer Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 18 Aug 05 Posts: 965 Credit: 5,363,919 RAC: 11,846	Message 44065 - Posted: 16 Oct 2012, 23:49:37 UTC - in response to Message 44063.
	Yes, now binary is correct. Task running.
	ID: 44065 ·

Raistmer Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 18 Aug 05 Posts: 965 Credit: 5,363,919 RAC: 11,846	Message 44066 - Posted: 16 Oct 2012, 23:50:22 UTC - in response to Message 44064. Last modified: 16 Oct 2012, 23:51:57 UTC
	I've released 6.99 which should have the correct binary. Sorry about that. I have one ati_opencl_100 running at the moment, should be done in 30 minutes. I have suspended all other ati_opencl_100, so when that one is finished, my first ati_opencl_sah should start. I received 47 ati_opencl_sah tasks Did I also get the wrong binaries? I got: setiathome_6.98_windows_intelx86__opencl_ati_sah.exe setiathome_6.98_windows_intelx86__opencl_ati_sah.pdb MultiBeam_Kernels_r1643.cl If those are wrong, what should I do with the tasks I have? You should do project reset for SETI beta. [And for now suspend all ATi 6.98 work until you will finish other beta work]
	ID: 44066 ·

Sten-Arne Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 10 Mar 12 Posts: 484 Credit: 2,544,646 RAC: 7,111	Message 44067 - Posted: 16 Oct 2012, 23:52:11 UTC - in response to Message 44066.
	I've released 6.99 which should have the correct binary. Sorry about that. I have one ati_opencl_100 running at the moment, should be done in 30 minutes. I have suspended all other ati_opencl_100, so when that one is finished, my first ati_opencl_sah should start. I received 47 ati_opencl_sah tasks Did I also get the wrong binaries? I got: setiathome_6.98_windows_intelx86__opencl_ati_sah.exe setiathome_6.98_windows_intelx86__opencl_ati_sah.pdb MultiBeam_Kernels_r1643.cl If those are wrong, what should I do with the tasks I have? You should do project reset for SETI beta. So, I did get the wrong binaries? Is that what you say?
	ID: 44067 ·

Claggy Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 29 May 06 Posts: 656 Credit: 6,134,847 RAC: 15,587	Message 44068 - Posted: 16 Oct 2012, 23:54:41 UTC - in response to Message 44067.
	Yes, you have 6.98, you need 6.99 Claggy
	ID: 44068 ·

Sten-Arne Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 10 Mar 12 Posts: 484 Credit: 2,544,646 RAC: 7,111	Message 44069 - Posted: 16 Oct 2012, 23:55:41 UTC - in response to Message 44068.
	Yes, you have 6.98, you need 6.99 Claggy How sad. Ok, I will reset.
	ID: 44069 ·

Raistmer Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 18 Aug 05 Posts: 965 Credit: 5,363,919 RAC: 11,846	Message 44070 - Posted: 17 Oct 2012, 0:10:27 UTC - in response to Message 44069.
	Yes, you have 6.98, you need 6.99 Claggy How sad. Ok, I will reset. Not your fault anyway. But the light side - when you will get 6.99 it should really work :)
	ID: 44070 ·

Sten-Arne Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 10 Mar 12 Posts: 484 Credit: 2,544,646 RAC: 7,111	Message 44071 - Posted: 17 Oct 2012, 0:14:55 UTC - in response to Message 44070.
	Yes, you have 6.98, you need 6.99 Claggy How sad. Ok, I will reset. Not your fault anyway. But the light side - when you will get 6.99 it should really work :) Well, I got the 6.99 binaries, but the tasks were resent and are still named 6.98. But maybe that's what to expect.
	ID: 44071 ·

Claggy Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 29 May 06 Posts: 656 Credit: 6,134,847 RAC: 15,587	Message 44072 - Posted: 17 Oct 2012, 0:29:20 UTC - in response to Message 44071.
	Yes, you have 6.98, you need 6.99 Claggy How sad. Ok, I will reset. Not your fault anyway. But the light side - when you will get 6.99 it should really work :) Well, I got the 6.99 binaries, but the tasks were resent and are still named 6.98. But maybe that's what to expect. What happens if you restart Boinc? I've seen funny after effects after having tasks resent before, Claggy
	ID: 44072 ·

Sten-Arne Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 10 Mar 12 Posts: 484 Credit: 2,544,646 RAC: 7,111	Message 44073 - Posted: 17 Oct 2012, 0:33:56 UTC - in response to Message 44072.
	Yes, you have 6.98, you need 6.99 Claggy How sad. Ok, I will reset. Not your fault anyway. But the light side - when you will get 6.99 it should really work :) Well, I got the 6.99 binaries, but the tasks were resent and are still named 6.98. But maybe that's what to expect. What happens if you restart Boinc? I've seen funny after effects after having tasks resent before, Claggy Hmm, next request renamed them to 6.99. Funny effects indeed :-)
	ID: 44073 ·

B-Man Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 24 Aug 09 Posts: 79 Credit: 26,117 RAC: 0	Message 44075 - Posted: 17 Oct 2012, 1:46:24 UTC
	Any info on GPU support for OSX? Any updates as to support since both CUDA and Open CL are supported.
	ID: 44075 ·

Sten-Arne Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 10 Mar 12 Posts: 484 Credit: 2,544,646 RAC: 7,111	Message 44076 - Posted: 17 Oct 2012, 4:03:00 UTC Last modified: 17 Oct 2012, 4:11:35 UTC
	Well, my first result went inconclusive, even though the visible results in stderr, was the same as my wingman. Spike count: 10 Autocorr count: 0 Pulse count: 3 Triplet count: 0 Gaussian count: 0 There has to be some difference though between our results. wuid=4153634 Edit: Second one validated fine though: wuid=4153648
	ID: 44076 ·

TRuEQ & TuVaLu Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 28 Jan 11 Posts: 532 Credit: 1,383,581 RAC: 4,799	Message 44077 - Posted: 17 Oct 2012, 4:49:56 UTC
	First task is running...
	ID: 44077 ·

Raistmer Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 18 Aug 05 Posts: 965 Credit: 5,363,919 RAC: 11,846	Message 44079 - Posted: 17 Oct 2012, 5:52:23 UTC - in response to Message 44076.
	Well, my first result went inconclusive, even though the visible results in stderr, was the same as my wingman. Spike count: 10 Autocorr count: 0 Pulse count: 3 Triplet count: 0 Gaussian count: 0 There has to be some difference though between our results. wuid=4153634 Edit: Second one validated fine though: wuid=4153648 Despite my requests CUDA app still has no found signal printing in stderr so it's not possible to say what was wrong w/o offline task redone. Pity.
	ID: 44079 ·

Mike Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 16 Jun 05 Posts: 1585 Credit: 464,427 RAC: 676	Message 44091 - Posted: 17 Oct 2012, 13:06:31 UTC - in response to Message 44058. Last modified: 17 Oct 2012, 13:09:02 UTC
	We're just guessing at the requirements for this version, so point me at any hosts that are repeatedly failing with this app version. The app is fully OpenCL 1.0 compatible. I tested on HD 4770 (RV 770) HD 4850 with driver 12.1. Work group size 256 required. I suggest driver version 12.1. and newer. Running Windows XP driver 12.1 is the last driver with OpenCL support. Mike ____________
	ID: 44091 ·

Sten-Arne Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 10 Mar 12 Posts: 484 Credit: 2,544,646 RAC: 7,111	Message 44092 - Posted: 17 Oct 2012, 13:46:21 UTC - in response to Message 44091.
	We're just guessing at the requirements for this version, so point me at any hosts that are repeatedly failing with this app version. The app is fully OpenCL 1.0 compatible. I tested on HD 4770 (RV 770) HD 4850 with driver 12.1. Work group size 256 required. I suggest driver version 12.1. and newer. Running Windows XP driver 12.1 is the last driver with OpenCL support. Mike And I'm running my HD4850 on Vista with driver version 12.4, which also is an OpenCL 1.0 driver on the 4850. Apparently HD4850 doesn't support other than OpenCL 1.0, so no matter which newer driver you install, you will not get anything more than OpenCL 1.0 on that card. But you knew that already Mike, I'm just a bit chatty :-)
	ID: 44092 ·

Urs Echternacht Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 18 Jan 06 Posts: 808 Credit: 9,037,917 RAC: 18,681	Message 44094 - Posted: 17 Oct 2012, 14:02:55 UTC - in response to Message 44075.
	Any info on GPU support for OSX? Any updates as to support since both CUDA and Open CL are supported. Current situation with porting ATI OpenCL windows apps to Linux and OSX : Working on it, but at the moment too many wrong signals for a beta version. ____________ _\\|/_ Urs
	ID: 44094 ·

1 · 2 · 3 · 4 . . . 7 · Next

Message boards : News : SETI@home v7 6.98 for ATI OpenCL released.

AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956