PLEASE don't MIS-USE Optimized apps on Beta |
| log in |
Message boards : SETI@home Enhanced : PLEASE don't MIS-USE Optimized apps on Beta
1 · 2 · 3 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Hi, Please correct me if I am wrong, but I thought that we are not supposed to use optimized applications on the Beta WUs. | |
| ID: 16058 · | |
|
The Chicken soup works on Beta? Good news!!!! | |
| ID: 16060 · | |
|
It's not considered good form to use optimized apps here, but it might just be one of chicken's helpers making sure the opt. app. is compatible with the new data. | |
| ID: 16063 · | |
|
....ooooohhhh, yes Aurora, you are right. Sorry i have forgotten this is a Beta projekt. We are here for testing, not for the credits. | |
| ID: 16065 · | |
|
There is also the Joseph Segur et. al. "optimized" app. which is the only one that currently runs on WIN-9x (95, 98, 98SE, and ME) and is free of the timer bug. | |
| ID: 16071 · | |
|
Morning | |
| ID: 16074 · | |
It has come to my attention that a user has a farm of 18 or 20 hosts, using Chicken 2.2 on Beta. If you mean the farm, where e.g. this machine resides - yes, you are right, this is not using Joe's app because of Win9x, or optimized beta, but plain optimized for mainstream Seti :-( (According to the owner's only post on the lunatics.at site, I assume (s)he was not patient enough to wait for the (optimized) 5.17 S@H client.) Peter | |
| ID: 16106 · | |
|
Peter It has come to my attention that a user has a farm of 18 or 20 hosts, using Chicken 2.2 on Beta. ____________ Thanks to Paul and Friends Please consider a Donation to the Seti Project | |
| ID: 16115 · | |
|
Hi Guys, | |
| ID: 16127 · | |
|
[snip]
Pappa I thought I saw your picture in th Wiki next to "official Middleman" - LOL ;-) Seriously, I know I greatly appreciate all your efforts at coordination with the staff and I hope the other people here recognize all your hard behind the scenes work. You deserve at least a couple of atta-boys - just remember it takes 10 atta-boys to get rid of one OH CRAP! (sanitized for all ;-) ____________ !!Stupidity should be PAINFUL!! | |
| ID: 16157 · | |
So as far as "CElliot" is concerned who according to the profile is a Ph D Candidate... In their impatience may have missed something Important! I have many friends that have the silly letters after their names and they still retain "Common Sense." I guess that it becomes we are here to fix Problems! That is Job #1! I asked the person concerned a few days ago over on the main site why he was using this app and not surprisingly didn't get an answer..... Thread in question ____________ | |
| ID: 16158 · | |
|
I've noticed that "C Elliott" has tried to stop using the optimized apps on beta. Is it really that difficult to switch from using an optimized app? | |
| ID: 16170 · | |
I've noticed that "C Elliott" has tried to stop using the optimized apps on beta. Is it really that difficult to switch from using an optimized app? Click the project then click reset. BOINC will then download the stock app. ____________ | |
| ID: 16172 · | |
|
First, You would want to make sure that you ran work down to zero... That means if you have multiple machines it get to be a large pain in parts of your body that are not generally mentioned. I've noticed that "C Elliott" has tried to stop using the optimized apps on beta. Is it really that difficult to switch from using an optimized app? All that said, if there is an issue with specialized or optimized Applications, the User is not in a Set IT and Forget it Mode... YOU have to take time to manage it! Without saying too much, between what Joe has found and changes to the BOINC Core that is the reason we are not doing 5.18... This does not mention a basic "faster" Seti Application needs to be in place as MultiBeam moves to Seti Main... ____________ Thanks to Paul and Friends Please consider a Donation to the Seti Project | |
| ID: 16173 · | |
First, You would want to make sure that you ran work down to zero... That means if you have multiple machines it get to be a large pain in parts of your body that are not generally mentioned. Sorry, I’m not particularly sympathetic about such pains. It’s been made quite clear than users of optimized apps take on responsibility for maintaining the correct version. If these people had the time to install it, surely they also have the time to uninstall it. And anyway, I should think that in general beta-testers are expected to be in a position to monitor their systems quite closely, and I don’t see any reason this project would be an exception. Users who aren’t in a position to do so, to report problems that may not be evident from the results, for example, can’t be of much help. Then to be sure you would need to delete files in the project folder or disconnect and then reconnect to the project... Still more pain is parts of the body... Why should one have to “disconnect” (I presume you mean detach)? Once the app_info file is removed BOINC should download the standard Beta app next time it asks for work. ____________ | |
| ID: 16210 · | |
|
CElliot is worried about quota restrictions but still doesn't find time to answer a simple question about his use of optimised applications on Beta even when he's been pointed to this thread...... | |
| ID: 16327 · | |
|
I have been recently paired with the CElliot host using an optimized app on a single core machine and typically have lost 10% on each WU. Not a big deal here in BETA, but when this goes live in main I'm sure there will be much howling involved on the boards (especially with a quorum of 2 and the credits being granted to the lower of the quorum returns - even if the higher is listed as the canonical result). | |
| ID: 16651 · | |
|
Astropulse is here! If you use an optimized app you'll be left out in the cold! | |
| ID: 17278 · | |
Astropulse is here! If you use an optimized app you'll be left out in the cold! But I don't and I haven't got one yet!!! ____________ [b]"I'm trying to maintain a shred of dignity in this world." - Me[/b] | |
| ID: 17291 · | |
|
I know we need to test everything, but 4.x apps do cause credit confusion. I though when a quorum of 2 was needed, and the numbers were different, it averaged them, but this is not what happens, the lowest number is taken. So 2 of us crunched with a 5.x and got about the same credit, but the 4.x one got in as number 2, so the lower credit was granted for all 3. | |
| ID: 18342 · | |
Message boards :
SETI@home Enhanced :
PLEASE don't MIS-USE Optimized apps on Beta