Message boards :
News :
SETI@home v7 6.94 release for windows_intelx86 and i686-linux
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 11 Jun 11 Posts: 4 Credit: 127,590 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Mine too! |
Send message Joined: 11 Jun 11 Posts: 4 Credit: 127,590 RAC: 0 ![]() |
All 6.94 tasks on my Win7_64 host end in a computation error within seconds.(exit code -1073741515 (0xffffffffc0000135)) I had the same problem, now solved. Many thanks |
Send message Joined: 1 May 07 Posts: 556 Credit: 6,470,846 RAC: 0 ![]() |
|
Send message Joined: 1 May 07 Posts: 556 Credit: 6,470,846 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Good morning Claggy Urs. Just been checking WU’s have a few Computer errors. Host 50824. Has this error been reported before. Or am I missing something. I have cleared out project folder and reset project. Was running r246 on this host. wuid=3428929 wuid=3429011 wuid=3429013 Stderr output <core_client_version>6.12.26</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> - exit code -1073741515 (0xc0000135) </message> ]]> Also found these on wing person host. wuid=3428930 wuid=3429014 Michael |
Send message Joined: 29 May 06 Posts: 1037 Credit: 8,440,339 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Father Ambrose, Read Eric's last post in this thread, and the posts after it, i've already supplied the fix (until Eric deprecates the windows app, and reissues it with the missing file) Resetting the project would have cleared out that file, Claggy |
Send message Joined: 1 May 07 Posts: 556 Credit: 6,470,846 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Thanks Claggy Just got back off holiday and had read some of those messages. libfftw3f-3-1-1a_upx.dll reading it as a 64 bit rather than 32 bit. I did try it it still errored out. (or are they both the same?) I copied all files from my laptop which was working okay. Seems to be running okay with that version of libfftw3f-3-1-1a_upx.dll 32 bit? Michael |
![]() Send message Joined: 21 Jan 06 Posts: 104 Credit: 68,358 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Yesterday I decided to install Ubuntu 11.04 and downloaded 2 6.94 wu's. Using both cores I saw that one wu wasn't showing any progress in the manager (6.10.59). Suspending the "running" wu ended up in what looked like a wu not showing any progress after restarting the wu. A complete restart of the computer resulted in a wu showing progress. Again supended the wu and after restarting it again it looked like the wu got stuck in it's progress. So again a restart of the system... and I now have a running wu again. Fingers crossed... ;-) ![]() |
![]() Send message Joined: 21 Jan 06 Posts: 104 Credit: 68,358 RAC: 0 ![]() |
First wu finished, but the second one was running for more than 5 hours and checkpointed for the last time at 00.02.49. No progress since that (0.384%). Decited to aboard this result. Edit: Work Unit Info: ............... WU true angle range is : 0.312225 Optimal function choices: -------------------------------------------------------- name timing error -------------------------------------------------------- v_BaseLineSmooth (no other) v_vGetPowerSpectrumUnrolled 0.000546 0.00000 sse2_ChirpData_ak8 0.015358 0.00000 v_vTranspose4x16ntw 0.003874 0.00000 BH SSE folding 0.002021 0.00000 Restarted at 0.38 percent. Restarted at 0.38 percent. Restarted at 0.38 percent. Restarted at 0.38 percent. Restarted at 0.38 percent. Restarted at 0.38 percent. Restarted at 0.38 percent. Restarted at 0.38 percent. Restarted at 0.38 percent. Restarted at 0.38 percent. Restarted at 0.38 percent. Restarted at 0.38 percent. ![]() |
©2023 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.