Message boards :
SETI@home Enhanced :
No deletion of old files for a while
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() Send message Joined: 8 Jun 11 Posts: 9 Credit: 307,816 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I fear we are going to collapse because of out of diskspace... ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 16 Jun 05 Posts: 2530 Credit: 1,074,556 RAC: 0 ![]() |
No worries. Eric made a cleanup not that long ago. With each crime and every kindness we birth our future. |
Send message Joined: 29 May 06 Posts: 1037 Credit: 8,440,339 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Eric turned off file deletion so when we do get invalid results, we can still download the Wu to run it offline and find out why it was invalid, Claggy |
Send message Joined: 14 Oct 05 Posts: 1137 Credit: 1,848,733 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I fear we are going to collapse because of out of diskspace... The amount of diskspace this project uses is very small relative to the main project, and the WU or Task pages only reflect BOINC database records rather than actual WU or uploaded Result files. Eric has always tried to delay purging the BOINC database records while the data is still pertinent to whatever is being Beta tested. Joe |
Send message Joined: 3 Jan 07 Posts: 1451 Credit: 3,272,268 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I think we may have a problem with deleted files, after all. I just had a run of downloading errors: Error SETI@home v7 tasks for computer 12316. These are all resends for workunits in the range 3788475 to 3842403, created 19 Jan 2012. I can't get the input files manually either, and it's led to a lot of bad karma in the BOINC v7.0.28 message log: 22/06/2012 10:07:10 | SETI@home Beta Test | Started download of 05oc11al.25211.14419.7.14.189 Oh yes my app_info does have a usable version - what does it think crunched the pending and valid tasks in the same run? |
Send message Joined: 14 Oct 05 Posts: 1137 Credit: 1,848,733 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I think we may have a problem with deleted files, after all. I just had a run of those on 10490 too, with creation dates of both 19 and 20 January. But curiously in the middle of those I also got one which downloaded OK for WU 3849146. I don't see any obvious clues why that one worked, it's sort of in the middle of the ones which failed. Well, having the basic quota at 33 at least limits the number each host will "error" on. Like the -221 server aborts, this -224 error caused by the server's HTTP 404 really ought not be counted as a client error, though Dr. Anderson is so set against liberalizing anything a user might use for cherry picking that it surely won't change. Joe |
![]() Send message Joined: 18 Jan 06 Posts: 1038 Credit: 18,734,730 RAC: 0 ![]() |
06/23/12 12:12:26 | SETI@home Beta Test | Started download of 05oc11al.6268.14010.3.14.103 06/23/12 12:12:30 | SETI@home Beta Test | Giving up on download of 05oc11al.6268.14010.3.14.103: permanent HTTP error 06/23/12 12:12:31 | SETI@home Beta Test | Started download of 05oc11al.6268.13192.3.14.153 06/23/12 12:12:38 | SETI@home Beta Test | Giving up on download of 05oc11al.6268.13192.3.14.153: permanent HTTP error ... 06/23/12 12:47:56 | SETI@home Beta Test | This computer has finished a daily quota of 1 tasks Also got these ugly "permanent errors" on my host, hundreds! The effect the quota message shows. This made me check my network hardware first, before i concluded that the problem was not located on my side. Luckily i have enough "good" workunits on that host, so the quota will be no problem. @Josef W. Segur: ...ought not be counted as a client error, though Dr. Anderson is so set against liberalizing anything a user might use for cherry picking that it surely won't change. Thanks for adding the reason why this approach has been choosen. _\|/_ U r s |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 2 May 07 Posts: 192 Credit: 509,411 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I've had my fair share of these in the last few days on my rig 43303, currently six in total. These are resends for work units between 3771876 and 3787699, all created on 19 January 2012. I also have several in my pending list that have been resent to others, with the same -224 error: Created on 19 January 2012: 3780589, 3780605, 3846780 Created on 20 January 2012: 3847692, 3853225 I've got a couple more from 20 January 2012 that haven't been resent yet: 3860624, 3860635 Can this be fixed? ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 15 Jun 05 Posts: 970 Credit: 1,495,169 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I thought I would also report the following in case it might help in Beta testing: as Joe so nicely explained in Message 43012 ..... I'm using: BOINC 7.0.28 Windows XP computer #1 my computer was using: v7 v6.97 and marked as: valid computer #2 was using: v7 v6.97 and marked as: invalid computer #3 was using: Anonymous platform and marked as: valid ???????? is that correct ?? http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/workunit.php?wuid=3851336
|
©2023 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.