Message boards :
News :
S@H version 7.02 released for ATI/AMD GPUs under windows.
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() Send message Joined: 15 Mar 05 Posts: 1547 Credit: 27,183,456 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Hopefully this will fix the problems most people are having. I'll be looking for min and max driver revisions under which this version functions. ![]() |
![]() Send message Joined: 10 Mar 12 Posts: 1700 Credit: 13,216,373 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Hopefully this will fix the problems most people are having. I'll be looking for min and max driver revisions under which this version functions. Well, I reset the project, but it still sends out 7.01, which as we know fails, and also sends out 7.02 which seems to work. Please stop sending out r1799, we can have a fresh start with 7.02. Now after a new reset, I get 7.02 but they run as r1799 and fails because no compilation is made of course. Edit: I give up for now. Still sending out 7.01 fails and fails, not sending out any 7.02 app now. I will do another reset with a removed GPU from the preferences, and only run CPU until this is fixed. |
![]() Send message Joined: 15 Mar 05 Posts: 1547 Credit: 27,183,456 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I think 7.01 should stop being sent now. ![]() |
![]() Send message Joined: 10 Mar 12 Posts: 1700 Credit: 13,216,373 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I think 7.01 should stop being sent now. Yup, works better now after last reset I only got 7.02 (ati_opencl_sah) , but now with all my failures, my daily quota for oddly enough the CPU stops me from getting any CPU tasks. I have 10, 7.02 (ati_opencl_sah), and the first one runs just fine now. |
![]() Send message Joined: 10 Mar 12 Posts: 1700 Credit: 13,216,373 RAC: 0 ![]() |
First 7.02 finished and validated. The stderr is a bit long and messy because I restarted the WU a couple of times to adjust some settings. http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/result.php?resultid=13371860 Edit: Also lots of "WARNING: suboptimal workgroup size for PC_find_pulse_kernel" but that is expected with VHAR's, and only VHAR's. If you have set -sbs 256. If setting sbs to 128 they disappear but the app becomes slower. Edit 2: Just noticed that SETI@home v7 7.01 windows_intelx86 (ati_opencl_sah), was simply replaced by SETI@home v7 7.02 windows_intelx86 (ati_opencl_sah), on the Application details for host 57178 page http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/host_app_versions.php?hostid=57178, instead of 7.02 being added to the page. I haven't done 32 7.02 WU's this fast :-). |
![]() Send message Joined: 15 Mar 05 Posts: 1547 Credit: 27,183,456 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I'm not sure how that would happen. It's possible that's no new server code David did to make new app versions inherit from older ones. ![]() |
![]() Send message Joined: 10 Mar 12 Posts: 1700 Credit: 13,216,373 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I'm not sure how that would happen. It's possible that's no new server code David did to make new app versions inherit from older ones. Ok I see. On another note, are there only VLAR's in the pipe now? I don't get any new tasks for my GPU. (not getting any for my CPU, I can live with, until another day begins) Acer-desktop SETI@home Beta Test 2013-04-08 20:54:41 Requesting new tasks for GPU SETI@home Beta Test 2013-04-08 20:54:45 Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks |
![]() Send message Joined: 15 Mar 05 Posts: 1547 Credit: 27,183,456 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Yeah, it's mostly VLARs and most everyone asking for work is not asking for CPU work. ![]() |
![]() Send message Joined: 10 Mar 12 Posts: 1700 Credit: 13,216,373 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Yeah, it's mostly VLARs and most everyone asking for work is not asking for CPU work. I can wait. I'm pretty good at waiting games :-) |
Send message Joined: 29 May 06 Posts: 1037 Credit: 8,440,339 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I'll be looking for min and max driver revisions under which this version functions. As i keep repeating again and a again, the Max OpenCL device version has to be 'OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (938.2)' which is what comes with Cat 12.8, The OpenCL runtime that comes with Cat 12.10 produces compilations that cause the wrong number of pulses to be found, leading to the rash of AMD/ATI app inconclusives, Drivers after that produce compilations that use less registers and cause driver restarts on some Wu's, and low GPU usage/High CPU usage on others. The APP runtime with Cat 13.2 and Cat 13.3 Beta's fail to do the compilations at all. It is O.K to do the compilations under Cat 12.8/APP runtime 938.2, then upgrade to a later driver, the app will work fine (the compilations are only done when first run) What you can't do is do the compilations on a later APP runtime, then revert to an earlier driver, compilations are already done wrong, only manual deletion, or a detach/reattach will remove them. ATI Driver Version Cheat Sheet Claggy |
![]() Send message Joined: 15 Mar 05 Posts: 1547 Credit: 27,183,456 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I know you keep repeating it, but that doesn't give me the minimum version required. It also doesn't give me the way to translate 938.2 into a version number of the type that BOINC reports for the driver (1.4.1720, for example). Didn't see the link to the cheat sheet. Thanks. Unfortunately there's no way to distinguish the 1.4.1741 that comes with 12.8 from the 1.4.1741 that comes 12.10+. ![]() |
Send message Joined: 29 May 06 Posts: 1037 Credit: 8,440,339 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I know you keep repeating it, but that doesn't give me the minimum version required. It also doesn't give me the way to translate 938.2 into a version number of the type that BOINC reports for the driver (1.4.1720, for example). 1.4.1720 is a CAL driver version, the app is an OpenCL app, the CAL driver versions have all remained the same recently, the APP runtime version is the important version with these apps, looking at my client_state.xml and sched_request_setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu_beta.xml files, it is the <opencl_platform_version>OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (938.2)</opencl_platform_version> or <opencl_device_version>OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (938.2)</opencl_device_version> sections you should look at, expect some devices to be only OpenCL 1.1 compliant, depending on Hardware or driver version, i don't expect OpenCL 1.0 devices to work at all, being HD4*** GPUs. Claggy |
![]() Send message Joined: 15 Mar 05 Posts: 1547 Credit: 27,183,456 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I don't think that information is currently available to the plan classes. Do you know which BOINC version it was added in? ![]() |
![]() Send message Joined: 10 Mar 12 Posts: 1700 Credit: 13,216,373 RAC: 0 ![]() |
We need some non VLAR's from the splitters, or we will never be able to test 7.02. I haven't been able to get anything other than CPU tasks since the initial 9 or so 7.02s I crunched just after the release of 7.02. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 18 Aug 05 Posts: 2423 Credit: 15,878,738 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Yeah, it's mostly VLARs and most everyone asking for work is not asking for CPU work. Eric, ATi app should be capable to do VLARs too. LEts' test this at least at beta! |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 18 Aug 05 Posts: 2423 Credit: 15,878,738 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I know you keep repeating it, but that doesn't give me the minimum version required. It also doesn't give me the way to translate 938.2 into a version number of the type that BOINC reports for the driver (1.4.1720, for example). Eric, we need to convince David to report OpenCL runtime version for OpenCL devices. "Driver" versions have nothing to do with computations BOINC performs. |
![]() Send message Joined: 28 Jan 11 Posts: 619 Credit: 2,580,051 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Did some tasks during this night and the day on 5850 and 5970. I ran 2 tasks, 1 on each card. Worked like charm :) I am now running 1 task on 5850 and 2 tasks on 5970. It looks like it is working. Link to computor: http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/hosts_user.php?userid=14842 |
![]() Send message Joined: 28 Jan 11 Posts: 619 Credit: 2,580,051 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Something strange happend now. All tasks in BM stoped counting in progres meter including 1 docking task and 1 wu-prop task. 1 SETI beta was at 92% when the "clock" stoped. And the task was completed when the "clock" started to count again. And a new task was at 9%. Windows Gui worked and SIV showed that all 3 GPU's was running. A bit strange.....Might be BM 7.0.60, I dunno. ideas anyone?? Hapend again after 20mins. All BM counters stoped for about 1min and then resumed. Win GUI works and SIV reports activity on all cpu and gpu's. Must be BM 7.0.60 I'll look at BM project page for clues. |
Send message Joined: 3 Jan 07 Posts: 1451 Credit: 3,272,268 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Something strange happend now. It's been happening to me ever since I got a Windows 7 laptop, over two years ago - nothing new there. But there is a v7.0.62 to test, with "major overhaul of work-fetch logic" (just what we need, in the last few days leading up to a major release). Best concentrate on testing that for now. |
![]() Send message Joined: 28 Jan 11 Posts: 619 Credit: 2,580,051 RAC: 0 ![]() |
running 7.0.62 now |
©2023 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.