Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /disks/centurion/b/carolyn/b/home/boincadm/projects/beta/html/inc/ on line 663
Reputation of hosts, a question.

Reputation of hosts, a question.

Message boards : SETI@home Science : Reputation of hosts, a question.
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Grumpy Swede
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 10 Mar 12
Posts: 1700
Credit: 13,216,373
RAC: 0
Message 46304 - Posted: 12 Jun 2013, 20:18:04 UTC
Last modified: 12 Jun 2013, 20:22:17 UTC

Would it be possible to take into consideration when sending out resends, the reputation of a host (like its reputation of producing valid results, and how fast it usually sends back results), and send out resends primarily to hosts with the highest reputation?

There's often results hanging there in the database for many weeks, or even months, waiting for hosts that never sends back the result. Then it times out and is sent out again, and often again is being sent to a host who will at best send it back in a couple of weeks, or at worst never be heard from again. Then the cycle begins all over again....

Having hosts with high reputation for reliability as the primary resend hosts, would likely reduce the demand on the database, as well as the size of the database, since it wouldn't be som many tasks out there in the wild at the same time.
WARNING!! "THIS IS A SIGNATURE", of the "IT MAY CHANGE AT ANY MOMENT" type. It may, or may not be considered insulting, all depending upon HOW SENSITIVE THE VIEWER IS, to certain inputs to/from the nervous system.
ID: 46304 · Report as offensive
Dr Who Fan
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 11
Posts: 13
Credit: 205,673
RAC: 0
United States
Message 46309 - Posted: 13 Jun 2013, 19:54:55 UTC - in response to Message 46304.  

I have to agree with you on this one. It should be use here at Beta and at SETI main. It would definitely help the ever growing database tables problem they have had at main.

Another thing that would help the database issues would be to reduce the initial turn-around (deadline) times to 14 days for new tasks and 7 days for all resends. I don't know any other project with such long deadline as SETI.

I know BoincSIMAP used reliable hosts for resends. The resent tasks are sent out as high-priority so they get pushed to the front of the line for processing.

ID: 46309 · Report as offensive

Message boards : SETI@home Science : Reputation of hosts, a question.

©2023 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.