Just singed on

Author	Message
J D K Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 7 Sep 05 Posts: 38 Credit: 33,370 RAC: 0	Message 913 - Posted: 7 Sep 2005, 2:45:54 UTC Last modified: 7 Sep 2005, 2:49:54 UTC Hi, just signed on Using P4 840ee HT 1 gig ram, CC4.72, Seti enhanced 4.04, WUs have a completion date of 9/27/05 and a to completion time of 3.26.37. have 43 WUs on hand, and now off we go. BOINC Wiki ID: 913 ·

kb7rzf Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 21 Aug 05 Posts: 720 Credit: 43,124 RAC: 0	Message 915 - Posted: 7 Sep 2005, 4:26:25 UTC Welcome aboard Jim. I wound up re-attaching after the outage, as apparently I messed up the optimized installation. I'm just running the standard app, on a Dell Deimension Celeron Processor, running at 2.6ghz, 512mb ram, using 4.45 client (optimized). So far so good. Jeremy ID: 915 ·

Divide Overflow Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 14 Jun 05 Posts: 88 Credit: 13,041 RAC: 0	Message 916 - Posted: 7 Sep 2005, 5:13:01 UTC - in response to Message 913. ...have 43 WUs on hand, and now off we go. Welcome to beta. Make yourself comfortable. With 43 WU's, you'll be crunching a while! ;) ID: 916 ·

TPR_Mojo Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 7 Sep 05 Posts: 16 Credit: 445,810 RAC: 0	Message 917 - Posted: 7 Sep 2005, 9:46:47 UTC Just added this project onto my farm too after seeing the post on the normal SETI messageboard. That's 25+ Windows/Linux machines I'll be adding - should help the quorum problems ;) ID: 917 ·

[B^S] Paul@home Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 15 Jun 05 Posts: 64 Credit: 57,814 RAC: 0	Message 919 - Posted: 7 Sep 2005, 9:57:48 UTC Jim and Lowfield - Welcome! Join BOINC Synergy ID: 919 ·

J D K Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 7 Sep 05 Posts: 38 Credit: 33,370 RAC: 0	Message 923 - Posted: 7 Sep 2005, 11:21:54 UTC Enhanced 4.04 seems to be processing at a normal speed, I have crunched 4 WUs in about 2.42 hrs BOINC Wiki ID: 923 ·

Mr.Pernod Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 6 Sep 05 Posts: 25 Credit: 105,679 RAC: 0	Message 926 - Posted: 7 Sep 2005, 14:01:30 UTC just signed on yesterday, after seeing the call for help on the regular boards ;) was a bit surprised to find my dual athlon, running the beta 4.04 windows core client, is crunching these beta wu's in about the same time it used to crunch regular wu's with the optimized client. beta wu details report 4.04 as used core, but the similarity in crunchtimes has me a bit worried, should I be? ID: 926 ·

Ingleside Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 14 Jun 05 Posts: 94 Credit: 147,582 RAC: 0	Message 927 - Posted: 7 Sep 2005, 14:22:19 UTC - in response to Message 926. Last modified: 7 Sep 2005, 14:23:50 UTC just signed on yesterday, after seeing the call for help on the regular boards ;) was a bit surprised to find my dual athlon, running the beta 4.04 windows core client, is crunching these beta wu's in about the same time it used to crunch regular wu's with the optimized client. beta wu details report 4.04 as used core, but the similarity in crunchtimes has me a bit worried, should I be? No, different angle-range gives different crunch-times. See for more detailed answer ID: 927 ·

Mr.Pernod Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 6 Sep 05 Posts: 25 Credit: 105,679 RAC: 0	Message 928 - Posted: 7 Sep 2005, 14:33:36 UTC I see, thanks ID: 928 ·

©2023 University of California

SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.