Overlooked Work Unit?

Author	Message
James W Send message Joined: 26 May 12 Posts: 51 Credit: 4,956,027 RAC: 13	Message 1970761 - Posted: 17 Dec 2018, 5:28:39 UTC This work unit appears to have fallen through the cracks. First 2 tasks "validation inconclusive," but tiebreaker came through 21 Nov, which notes "completed, waiting for validation." However, never validated? Could this be reviewed? Work unit: 3222345351 Task=7154680830 Host=7163447 Rec'd=20 Nov 2018, 4:16:42 UTC Completed, validation inconclusive Task=7154680831 Host=8516438 Rec'd=18 Nov 2018, 19:00:15 UTC Completed, validation inconclusive Task=7161210264 Host=8291196 Rec'd=21 Nov 2018, 5:31:46 UTC Completed, waiting for validation ID: 1970761 ·

Unixchick Send message Joined: 5 Mar 12 Posts: 815 Credit: 2,361,516 RAC: 22	Message 1970814 - Posted: 17 Dec 2018, 19:27:01 UTC oops. I'm curious what happens to "lost" WUs like this. I'm guessing it is a rare occurrence. Will it just sit in the db forever? Is there a cleanup routine?? (if so, how often is it run?) . I don't have any answers, but just hope that when it is a month "stale" in a few days that some routine will catch it, or maybe a good db clean at the end of the year?? ID: 1970814 ·

Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 37729 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489	Message 1970817 - Posted: 17 Dec 2018, 19:35:30 UTC This happens at times, but usually gets corrected when the tasks hit their report deadlines which in this case is the 10 Jan 2019, 11:28:11 UTC. Cheers. ID: 1970817 ·

©2025 University of California

SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.