Message boards :
Number crunching :
CPU usage, clock speed, RAM speed - what do you do?
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() Send message Joined: 28 Nov 02 Posts: 5126 Credit: 276,046,078 RAC: 462 ![]() |
I will also take a look at pushing this ram. The XMP profiles changes when I changed MB's. I did have a profile at 3000 now it has two and the faster one is just below 3000. Lovely. Bios rounding error. Well Seti started quitting so I reset "everything" to default. Then added the XMP#2 profile, set the iGPU to 1600 with 1.21volts, turned off the "cool n' quiet" and the C states. I think I am going to have to break down and find some "high performance" ram if I really want the cpu processing to pickup. Tom A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association). |
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 ![]() ![]() |
Ryzen "loves" good quality RAM like Samsung B-dies or Micron E-dies. Going to cost though. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours ![]() ![]() A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
![]() Send message Joined: 28 Nov 02 Posts: 5126 Credit: 276,046,078 RAC: 462 ![]() |
Ryzen "loves" good quality RAM like Samsung B-dies or Micron E-dies. Going to cost though. A preliminary test might be inorder. I have one pair of ddr4-3200 (I think it was living in the 2990wx for a while) installed in my current top performer. Since the 90% of the "top performer" has nothing to do with how fast the cpu is, I could throttle the cpu back a bit and probably not notice the loss of production. Tom A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association). |
![]() Send message Joined: 28 Nov 02 Posts: 5126 Credit: 276,046,078 RAC: 462 ![]() |
Ryzen "loves" good quality RAM like Samsung B-dies or Micron E-dies. Going to cost though. Actually hiding under a pile was the other pair of ddr4-3200. I installed it on the 2400G/MSI B350 Tomahawk MB. With the XMP 3200 enabled. And the task manager promptly started showing that the CPU was running at near its top turbo speed (3.9Ghz) under "auto". My other box is not complaining (Yet) so I will go forward. ASIS Tom A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association). |
![]() Send message Joined: 28 Nov 02 Posts: 5126 Credit: 276,046,078 RAC: 462 ![]() |
However, my Windows box with the 2400G started crashing and re-starting after I changed the Ram. I now have set everything to default except the Ram which is still set with the XMP setting for the 3200 speed. If the issue goes away, I can then report that faster ram made the infinity fabric enough faster to screw everything else up ;) Tom A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association). |
Alien Seeker ![]() Send message Joined: 23 May 99 Posts: 57 Credit: 511,652 RAC: 32 ![]() ![]() |
I'm very temperature-conscious when running SETI@home (or other CPU-intensive tasks), because one of my computers only has passive cooling and the other is a laptop. It relates to what you say about power-consumption, albeit in an indirect way. I don't physically underclock my computers, both because I don't know how to do it and because I like having more power for potential temporary uses. I don't have available GPUs. After a bit of experimentation, I've found that limiting CPU time works better to keep temperature moderate than limiting CPU percentage. Here are my current settings:
|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 23 May 99 Posts: 7381 Credit: 44,181,323 RAC: 238 ![]() ![]() |
Greetings Laura, I'm a bit confused here. You have been a member for 20 years; joined the same day as I did, May 23, 1999. You only have 2 computers listed with very low credits and RAC which were attached over the last 2 days. I'm confused... :| Have a great day! :) Siran [edit] Mystery solved. You quit SETI when they decided to go with "BING" (BOINC) and just started up again a few days ago. I see. :) BTW, the captcha is not that hard to use in forming a profile. ;) [/edit] CAPT Siran d'Vel'nahr - L L & P _\\// Winders 11 OS? "What a piece of junk!" - L. Skywalker "Logic is the cement of our civilization with which we ascend from chaos using reason as our guide." - T'Plana-hath |
![]() Send message Joined: 28 Nov 02 Posts: 5126 Credit: 276,046,078 RAC: 462 ![]() |
My understanding is you will get that kind of "intermittent" processing behavior when you the cpu % time used. We can probably confirm if it is even possible to change your cpu behavior in the bios by telling us the Brand/Model of your motherboards and/or Laptop. If your non-desktop has a "passive" cooler, it should be pretty cheap and easy to add an active cooler. There are "cooling" tables that you can sit under your laptop on so that it neither gets "real hot" nor "real noisy" :) I have found these cooling tables at both Walmart and Office Depot. They are also available online. Welcome back to our mutually Fascinating project! Tom A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association). |
Alien Seeker ![]() Send message Joined: 23 May 99 Posts: 57 Credit: 511,652 RAC: 32 ![]() ![]() |
Haha, yeah, I stopped when classic SETI@home was retired in favour of BOINC (oops, typo corrected) and I've just picked up again. I never had powerful computers, mind you, even back in the day. I even ran SETI@home on a 486 at some point. :-D
Honestly, I've already wasted way too much time of my life having to go through rounds and rounds of this specific captcha on other sites, now I don't even try anymore. It very efficiently filters out humans: Machines don't mind wasting their time, humans do! Gazing at the skies, hoping for contact... Unlikely, but it would be such a fantastic opportunity to learn. My alternative profile |
Alien Seeker ![]() Send message Joined: 23 May 99 Posts: 57 Credit: 511,652 RAC: 32 ![]() ![]() |
My understanding is you will get that kind of "intermittent" processing behavior when you the cpu % time used. Indeed, tasks repeatedly switch between EXECUTING and SUSPENDED, but it happens very quickly. With some values of "cpu_usage_limit", it results in a smooth load average over a minute, but with most, it isn't the case. We can probably confirm if it is even possible to change your cpu behavior in the bios by telling us the Brand/Model of your motherboards and/or Laptop. I'd rather not underclock the laptop, as it is my work computer and I need the power to run automated test suites. It's only the long-term usage I want to keep down. If your non-desktop has a "passive" cooler, it should be pretty cheap and easy to add an active cooler. That one is a fanless mini-PC. It looks like a rugged 20x15cm, 3cm high box. :-) I don't remember the exact brand, it was lent by the company I work for. A cooling table underneath it is a good idea indeed, I should have a look. Welcome back to our mutually Fascinating project! Thank you! Gazing at the skies, hoping for contact... Unlikely, but it would be such a fantastic opportunity to learn. My alternative profile |
![]() Send message Joined: 28 Nov 02 Posts: 5126 Credit: 276,046,078 RAC: 462 ![]() |
Well I think it may have been something Keith told me about way back when I was trying to get my Threadripper stable. Sometimes you have to turn off the Computer Boost so that Boinc is stable. So it has now run a 3.6Ghz, 3.7Ghz and today I am starting a run at 3.8Ghz. It apparently will turbo to 3.9Ghz. So far while the ddr4-3200 appears to have sustained my iGPU speeds/speedup that cpu tasks still don't seem to be coming down in processing time on the average. Still a number are running 2 1/2 hours. If the iGPU doesn't slow down I will be raising the cpu to 3.9Ghz next. Tom A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association). |
![]() Send message Joined: 28 Nov 02 Posts: 5126 Credit: 276,046,078 RAC: 462 ![]() |
I wonder when they will release/ship the Ryzen 5 2400G upgrade. This would make the cpu significantly more efficient. Might even improve the iGPU. Tom A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association). |
![]() Send message Joined: 28 Nov 02 Posts: 5126 Credit: 276,046,078 RAC: 462 ![]() |
I have just looked and the "average" for the cpu has dropped to 2 hours with another group of them showing lower than that. With the core boost off I have just set the cpu multiplier to 39. I also have a "game boost" toggle that I will try later. I tried pushing the speed of the ddr4.3200 ram up into the 3400 range but hit some odd hickup so I didn't stay there. Regressed to the highest XMP profile. The iGPU seems to still be running at about what it has been running. Tom A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association). |
![]() Send message Joined: 29 May 19 Posts: 86 Credit: 6,688,090 RAC: 32 ![]() ![]() |
Informally, I'm curious how everyone here crunches for S@H/BOINC. In particular: I have a few computers running, and some tablets. Currently they are all set to run 24/7 at 100% But the laptop is on default settings so bonic doesnt run when its on battery. Currently everything is 100% factory settings/standard. Truly not sure where to begin when it comes to OCing. |
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 30 Nov 05 Posts: 282 Credit: 6,916,194 RAC: 60 ![]() ![]() |
Welcome, and thanks for the response! It looks like you're off to a good start with the computers you have running and amount of tasks they are able to crunch!Informally, I'm curious how everyone here crunches for S@H/BOINC. In particular: Seti@home classic: 1,456 results, 1.613 years CPU time |
![]() Send message Joined: 28 Nov 02 Posts: 5126 Credit: 276,046,078 RAC: 462 ![]() |
Informally, I'm curious how everyone here crunches for S@H/BOINC. In particular: Mostly you should set your % of cpu cores to 90%. This usually will speed up things because when the computer wants to do "housekeeping" or anything else it has a couple of threads/cores available without causing a "task switch" with BOINC. If you are running Windows there are commandline's as well as app_config.xml that you can use that will probably speed you up. Do NOT run Intel gpu tasks. Tom A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association). |
![]() Send message Joined: 29 May 19 Posts: 86 Credit: 6,688,090 RAC: 32 ![]() ![]() |
Welcome, and thanks for the response! It looks like you're off to a good start with the computers you have running and amount of tasks they are able to crunch!Informally, I'm curious how everyone here crunches for S@H/BOINC. In particular: Thanks I am trying! ;) But, I want to help some more, besides upgrading everything...is there any advice? Should I sli GPUs in each PC, upgrade the ram sorta thing? I assume OCing helps..depending on how far you can take it. Might start with the two lower end PCs before I do my main. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 37752 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 ![]() ![]() |
Thanks I am trying! ;) But, I want to help some more, besides upgrading everything...is there any advice? Should I sli GPUs in each PC, upgrade the ram sorta thing?Unless you plan on playing games then SLi is pointless and your rigs have enough RAM, but if you do want to overclock then make sure that you have good cooling and airflow (stock cooling and cases isn't good enough for doing that). Cheers. |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13913 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 ![]() ![]() |
I assume OCing helps..depending on how far you can take it. 5% boost in performance, for a 15% increase in power usage. I'm happy running things as stock. Grant Darwin NT |
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 30 Nov 05 Posts: 282 Credit: 6,916,194 RAC: 60 ![]() ![]() |
What Wiggo and Grant said. To be clear, Seti (and Boinc in general, as far as I know) do not use SLI at all. Each GPU task can only be crunched by one GPU. Besides upgrading or purchasing more hardware, there are a few things. There are command line options you can enter to better optimize GPU tasks. There are also anonymous applications (i.e., Lunatics) you can run that process tasks faster. However, I know barely enough about both to know I don't know anything about them. If you browse through the boards you'll find topics about them if you want to be adventurous. Seti@home classic: 1,456 results, 1.613 years CPU time |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.