Message boards :
Number crunching :
Did u ever adjust Windows to run at your CPU Cache Settings ?
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
The_Matrix Send message Joined: 17 Nov 03 Posts: 414 Credit: 5,827,850 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Well folks, i wondered every time as my cpu usage was bad. Now try this: It's set for Ryzen 2700X Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Memory Management] "SecondLevelDataCache"=dword:00001000 "ThirdLevelDataCache"=dword:00004000 But on a i5-IvyBridge it's [for example]: Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Memory Management] "SecondLevelDataCache"=dword:00000400 "ThirdLevelDataCache"=dword:00001800 Decimal values have to be transformed into HEX values. See Ya ! |
![]() Send message Joined: 28 Nov 02 Posts: 5126 Credit: 276,046,078 RAC: 462 ![]() |
Well folks, i wondered every time as my cpu usage was bad. Now try this: I see your computer hasn't connected with Seti in more than a month. How is it doing? Tom A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association). |
The_Matrix Send message Joined: 17 Nov 03 Posts: 414 Credit: 5,827,850 RAC: 0 ![]() |
omg credits are so low.. What must i be ? CPU Task ? Which ? Before i am waiting too long , I'll crunch some wus. 1st wu = 11.39 percent at 14 minutes... approximately end at ~ 123 minutes or â€7,380‬ seconds. Hold it ! Keep waiting ! ^^ |
The_Matrix Send message Joined: 17 Nov 03 Posts: 414 Credit: 5,827,850 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Seti (alt) still 15 minutes , approximately 1h20m (overall) ~ 4800 seconds . Some comparsion systems are online ? SETI@home v8 v8.08 (alt) windows_x86_64 ~ 2 bit guppi For real : running-time at 4,539.63 seconds and cpu-time at 4,437.11 seconds. 75% cpus are working , only 3 cores. at 3.5 ghz Ok it's 32-bits and slower. 2nd wu SETI@home v8 v8.00 windows_intelx86 ~ 2 bit guppi For real : running-time at 5,498.55 seconds and cpu-time at 5,405.45 seconds. 75% cpus are working , only 3 cores. at 3.5 ghz 3rd wu SETI@home v8 v8.00 windows_intelx86 ~ 2 bit guppi For real : running-time at 5,502.35 seconds and cpu-time at 5,409.17 seconds. 75% cpus are working , only 3 cores. at 3.5 ghz |
The_Matrix Send message Joined: 17 Nov 03 Posts: 414 Credit: 5,827,850 RAC: 0 ![]() |
https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=6136300 ok, i found some comparisment workstation, but it's anonymous plattform mean, to install the anonymous "the alien ware". ^^ sorry. Can't hold it, but i will try the same on this. ok, the next three are 64-bits AVX. Measured 2bits guppt 2 times and one anything other ? Can't name it. |
The_Matrix Send message Joined: 17 Nov 03 Posts: 414 Credit: 5,827,850 RAC: 0 ![]() |
ok it's lunatics_win64_v0.45_beta6 CPU ONLY installed 4th SETI@home v8 Anonyme Plattform (CPU) ~ 2 bit guppi, means AVX 64-bits For real : running-time at 3,954.15 seconds and cpu-time at 3,904.77 seconds. Got lucky to be under 4K seconds. 75% cpus are working , only 3 cores. at 3.5 ghz 5th SETI@home v8 Anonyme Plattform (CPU) ~ 2 bit guppi, means AVX 64-bits For real : running-time at 4,075.73 seconds and cpu-time at 4,027.39 seconds. No luck. 75% cpus are working , only 3 cores. at 3.5 ghz 6th 01my19aa.10036.4566.10.37.93 means AVX 64-bits For real : running-time at 1,742.82 econds and cpu-time at 1,717.38 seconds. 75% cpus are working , only 3 cores. at 3.5 ghz _Validated_ Well after all this, no insane cliffhanger at all, so disappointing. Tomorrow i will force those SSE 2/3 settings, maybe an advance !? I'll see. Greets Edit: for further notice, i test some wus on the SSE3 lunatics app but... |
The_Matrix Send message Joined: 17 Nov 03 Posts: 414 Credit: 5,827,850 RAC: 0 ![]() |
no chance on windows, those lunatcis on Linux are unbeatable, i am done. Help get me some Linux... |
The_Matrix Send message Joined: 17 Nov 03 Posts: 414 Credit: 5,827,850 RAC: 0 ![]() |
U r my hero ! Yes , U Linux ! I just overread that i have crunched a wu with nearly 3k seconds, using SSE 4_2 lunatics. Back on crunching again ! |
![]() Send message Joined: 28 Nov 02 Posts: 5126 Credit: 276,046,078 RAC: 462 ![]() |
If I am reading the results right, you are getting respectable cpu crunching times on the two computers that have had time to crunch. One of them has a radeon card that you could crunch with. Have to wait a bit longer on the 3rd machine. Off to a GREAT start! Tom A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association). |
The_Matrix Send message Joined: 17 Nov 03 Posts: 414 Credit: 5,827,850 RAC: 0 ![]() |
card that you could crunch with. No idear to pay the electricity bill, u know ? ok i calculated that, i am able to run this gpu with seto for about a week ? Better that nothing.. |
![]() Send message Joined: 28 Nov 02 Posts: 5126 Credit: 276,046,078 RAC: 462 ![]() |
card that you could crunch with. In general you get more "bang for the buck" from crunching on a gpu. I suppose you could move your video card(s) to your fastest cpu cruncher and drop the other two offline? That "should" help with the electricity bill. I have started job hunting again after being "semi-retired". My electric bill has been soaring. Tom A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association). |
The_Matrix Send message Joined: 17 Nov 03 Posts: 414 Credit: 5,827,850 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Not possible, because i wana use it from Linux, NEVER succeeded in installing the same brand or both nvidia/amd/ati on one system. And for sure i wana bann windows licences from my systems. Forever ! One comfortable browsing machine is enough. |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.