SETI@Home will now cache 150 CPU work units and 150 per installed GPU
Message boards :
Number crunching :
SETI@Home will now cache 150 CPU work units and 150 per installed GPU
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13987 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 
 |
I wonder if Eric has increased the limits again because we are currently running at 7.27 million.Nope. I'd say it's due to all the shorties in the system at the moment- people that weren't hitting the server-side limits due to their cache setting are now carrying more WUs in their caches due to the shorter WU runtimes and the higher server-side limits. Once the shorties work through the system and we get longer running WUs again, the Work-in-progress should drop back down again,. Grant Darwin NT |
Speedy  Send message Joined: 26 Jun 04 Posts: 1648 Credit: 12,921,799 RAC: 89 
 |
I wonder if Eric has increased the limits again because we are currently running at 7.27 million.Nope. Yes Grant this makes complete sense because it was under the 7 mark yesterday 
|
 Tom M Send message Joined: 28 Nov 02 Posts: 5126 Credit: 276,046,078 RAC: 462 |
I have a box with 6 gpus and one cpu. It is showing 2,000 tasks waiting to be processed on the Website. That sounds about right I think for having NOT reverted to the lower processing limits while reverting to the previous version of server code. Tom A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association). |
juan BFP     Send message Joined: 16 Mar 07 Posts: 9786 Credit: 572,710,851 RAC: 3,799 
|
Does the limits changed again? It looks like the limits are now 150 for the CPU and 250 per GPU Can anyone confirm or not that? 
|
Mike  Send message Joined: 17 Feb 01 Posts: 34631 Credit: 79,922,639 RAC: 80 
|
Does the limits changed again? It seems so Juan. I have 400 tasks in cache. With each crime and every kindness we birth our future. |
Bill G  Send message Joined: 1 Jun 01 Posts: 1282 Credit: 187,688,550 RAC: 182 
|
Does the limits changed again? Same here on my systems.  SETI@home classic workunits 4,019 SETI@home classic CPU time 34,348 hours |
Mr. Kevvy  Send message Joined: 15 May 99 Posts: 3866 Credit: 1,114,826,392 RAC: 3,319 
|
Three good confirmations... I've edited the thread title (again). :^)
|
|
Cruncher-American Send message Joined: 25 Mar 02 Posts: 1513 Credit: 370,893,186 RAC: 340
|
It would seem from my two crunchers, that the defaults have been changed from 200 CPU + 300 per GPU to 150/150. Any info about that? Did I miss an announcement or something? |
Ville Saari  Send message Joined: 30 Nov 00 Posts: 1158 Credit: 49,177,052 RAC: 82,530 
|
In December they changed it from 100 for CPUs plus 100 for each GPU to 200/400 and soon after that to 200/300. After the super long Tuesday downtime they dropped the numbers to 150/250 and after today's outage to 150/150. |
|
juan BFP Send message Joined: 16 Mar 07 Posts: 9786 Credit: 572,710,851 RAC: 3,799
|
Does they down again to 150/150?
|
Oddbjornik  Send message Joined: 15 May 99 Posts: 220 Credit: 349,610,548 RAC: 1,728 
|
Does they down again to 150/150?That's what it looks like from here. |
|
Mr. Kevvy Send message Joined: 15 May 99 Posts: 3866 Credit: 1,114,826,392 RAC: 3,319
|
Title updated again. :^)
|
|
Tom M Send message Joined: 28 Nov 02 Posts: 5126 Credit: 276,046,078 RAC: 462 |
Title updated again. :^) Aren't you beginning to suffer from "Title fatigue"? A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association). |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.